'Board Effectiveness Evaluations' or 'Board Performance Reviews' help the board (and interested stakeholders) to understand how productive and successful the board is in the various components of board work.
In order to evaluate 'board effectiveness', a board needs to have established criteria or key objectives to review against. It is too broad to ask "How effective are we?"
Meeting Efficiencies (processes, formats, volume of work, frequency, duration, Agenda timings and structure, quality/timing of minutes, etc)
Quality of Relationships (intra-board, Chair & CEO, board and management, stakeholders, etc)
Performance (Chair, individuals, composition, committees, business, etc)
Compliance (systems, culture, monitoring, WHS, risk, etc)
Conduct (leadership, role models, code of conduct, decision making, managing conflicts, etc)
The first step is to agree what to evaluate. The subsequent step is to decide the most suitable methods for the evaluation. The methods can be objective (things that can be counted or ticked off such as how often board meetings run to time) subjective (views, opinions and the intangible such as how well the CEO is managed) or a combination of both.
Objective evaluations are easier, since they can be collated from data which is already available. Subjective evaluations are more difficult.
Surveys and interviews can be conducted either anonymously or known. Anonymous data gives participants the opportunity to be frank and honest. Open activities can result in better quality information as the participants can be asked follow up questions. For subjective evaluations you can consider a 'on a scale of 1-10' or 'which best describes' types of questions, or you can ask for free-flow feedback.
Objective data is accurate and reliable and subjective data can reveal risks and opportunities.
Benchmarks are established in advance (at the beginning of the period being evaluated) and the evaluation is performed at the end of the period. The board must be willing to accept the results and to take action based on the findings. Inevitably, board effectiveness evaluations will reveal where things are going wrong and where things are going well; both are opportunities for improvement.
The board might change the areas it measures and the board effectiveness benchmarks each year based on the needs and priorities of the business and the board. There may be additional board effectiveness and board evaluation requirements stipulated in the relevant legislation for the business and in third-party contracts such as in funding agreements.
The board effectiveness evaluation can be conducted formally (such as an annual review), informally (ongoing at every meeting), in-house (by the board) or externally through Board Consultants. The board decides what it will measure and the frequency of the board evaluations and should formally document a 'Board Performance Review Policy'.
The Effective Board Management Matrix™ is the framework for board evaluation, performance development resources and corporate governance training materials at the Board Coaching Institute.
The matrix breaks the board work down into roles and responsibilities, the requisite functions, the core mechanics, the intra-board and board-management relations and the key driving principles of board performance.
The segments cover the 'growth and performance' and 'compliance and monitoring' responsibilities and break these down into individual, board and business components. All or any of these can be used for Board Performance Reviews.
This matrix enables our participants to take a deep dive into each of the segments and to understand the correlation between each of the elements. Changes made in any of the segments will result in changes elsewhere in the organisation (every action creates a reaction).
Our strategies have helped senior executives from the following companies to achieve board success...
and we couldn't be more proud of the board successes they have enjoyed!
"It really gives executives the sense of confidence and appreciation for what the path forward is and to understand what we're looking for and what's going to make us happy and what is a good fit."
Gaven Needham
General Manager - APAC
Sydney, New South Wales
"My confidence has skyrocketed. It really gives executives the sense of confidence and appreciation for what the path forward is, and what's going to make us happy and is a good fit.
Her course and her style of delivery is 10 stars."
Patricia Lady
Chief Financial Officer
San Diego County, California, USA
"Prepares you not only for the obvious things like profiles and resumés, but the mentality that needs to go with it…
It sets your mindset in the right direction."
Derek Cashel
Group Chief Financial Officer
Sydney, New South Wales
Our strategies have helped senior executives from the following companies to achieve board success...
SITE MAP
© Copyright The Board Coaching Institute. All Rights Reserved.